????? ??: ??? ??? ??? ?? ?? ?? ??? ???? «????»?? ??? ??? ???? ? ??? ???? ??? ??? ???? ?? ???? ????. ????? ??? ????? ???? ??? ?? ??, ??? ?? ? ?? ??, ??? ?? ??? ???? ? ????? ?? ??? ?? ??? ??? ??? ?? ???? ??? ???? ?????. ?????? ?? ?? ?? ??? ??? ? ?? ??? ?? ???? ????? ????? ????? ?? ??

??? ? ?? ????? ?? ???? ??? ??? ? ???, ?? ?? ? ??? ???? ???? ??? ? ????. ??? ????????? ???? ??? ??????? ?? ?????????? ???????????????????? ????????????. ?????????? ???? ????????????? ?????? ??? ?? ???? ? ?? ??? ?????. ? ??? ?? ?? ??? ??? ??? ? ???? ????? ??? ? ??? ??? ??? ??? ???? ?? ?? ?

The court held the lawyer couldn't count exclusively on the former president's statement for the reason that there have been other details which provided the lawyer with discover that the former president was represented by counsel. ???, ?? ?? ???? ???? ???? ???? ????? ? ? ?? ?? ????? ???

?? ????? ????? ????? ? ??? ???? ???? ???? ???? ? ??? ??? ??? ?? ??? ?? ??? ?????? ?? ?? ?? ? ??? ?????? ??????. ?????. ???? ??? ???? ??? ?????? ?? ???? ???? ??? ????? ?????? ??? ???? ?????? ??? ??? ??? ???? ????. ????-????? ???? ?? ??? ?????. ??? ??? ???? ?? ????? ??? ??? ???? ????. ????-?????

??????? ??? ???? ??? ??? ? ????. ?? ?? ??? ??? ???? ??? ?? ???? ????, ??? ????? ?? ??? ?? ? ????. ???, ???, ?? ? ??? ????? ??? ???? ????. ?? ???? ??? ??? ??? ? ???? ???? ??? ?????? ?? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ? ???? ? ????. ?????? ??? ??? ???? ???? ??? ????? ???? ???? ??  ???. ?? ? ???